[Discuss] sudo
farrisga at gmail.com
farrisga at gmail.com
Mon Apr 3 10:05:49 PDT 2023
Your conclusion is completely and totally wrong.
First, all Linux systems are multiuser, please read UNIX system design
as an example, google it. All Linux systems, if even just a single
human user, have multiple users attached to various pieces of software.
This can easily be seen by viewing the /etc/passwd file. This is part
of it's security design.
I suggest you start by trying to understand security models and those
of UNIX as a beginning. The road you are on will get you into trouble.
Cheers
George
On Sun, 2023-04-02 at 18:59 -0700, bctill wrote:
> Hi all --
>
> It seems to me that the security and permissions model of Linux is
> based
> on the false premise that each system has multiple users. The
> opposite
> is far more often true: each user has multiple systems, and this has
> been the case for decades. Even in an enterprise environment, it's
> the
> network that has multiple users, not any one machine.
>
> In consequence of this anachronism, almost every command I type
> starts
> with sudo. Not only is this excruciatingly cumbersome, but it
> seriously
> undermines the vaunted safety benefits.
>
> The reality is that I want almost every process I create to execute
> with
> all my acces rights, and I am perfectly capapable of applying
> suitable
> access restrictions in the relatively rare cases when I execute a
> process that warrants them.
>
> Is there a way to set up Linux to reflect this reality?
>
> One thing I do like, by the way, is that I don't have to log in every
> time I turn my machine on because Linux can power down without
> logging
> me out.
>
> Or is it just Ubuntu that works this way?
>
> Regards,
> -- Bernie.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at vlug.org
> http://vlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_vlug.org
More information about the Discuss
mailing list