[Discuss] Ubuntu 22.04 apt-get problem
Znoteer
znoteer at mailbox.org
Tue Mar 28 15:29:58 PDT 2023
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 06:23:05PM -0400, Znoteer wrote:
> Hi Bernie,
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 08:57:07AM -0700, bctill wrote:
> > Hi Znoteer --
> >
> [snip]
>
> > $ sudo apt-cache policy g++ libc6 libc6-dev
> > g++:
> > Installed: (none)
> > Candidate: 4:11.2.0-1ubuntu1
> > Version table:
> > 4:11.2.0-1ubuntu1 500
> > 500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
> > libc6:
> > Installed: 2.35-0ubuntu3.1
> > Candidate: 2.35-0ubuntu3.1
> > Version table:
> > *** 2.35-0ubuntu3.1 100
> > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> > 2.35-0ubuntu3 500
> > 500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
> > libc6-dev:
> > Installed: (none)
> > Candidate: 2.35-0ubuntu3
> > Version table:
> > 2.35-0ubuntu3 500
> > 500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
>
> The question for me, is where did that v3.1 come from? Version 3 is in jammy main, but you have 2 candidate versions for libc6, 2.35-0ubuntu3, and 2.35-0ubuntu3.1. 3.1 is not from jammy/main.
Sorry, that was sloppy terminology. You don't have 2 candidate versions for lib6, but 2 available version in the libcy version table.
>
> I'm a Debian user myself. I haven't played with Ubuntu for well over 10 yrs. I don't remember how their repos are set up. Debian has basically main, contrib, non-free and some security and data updates. I can't remember what all the multiverse universe restricted etc, means.
>
> If this were a Debian system, I'd suspect you were using a backport (though that should be visible in the version number) or something you installed yourself, or from a non Debian repo.
>
> Do you know where you got that 3.1 libc6 from?
>
> --
> Znoteer
> znoteer at mailbox.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at vlug.org
> http://vlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_vlug.org
--
Znoteer
znoteer at mailbox.org
More information about the Discuss
mailing list